There is a common theme these days; one that I have heard from customers of all types.  It seems all organizations, from Fortune 100’s to local law firms, from Universities to remote public schools, are trying to “do more with less”.  Their objective is to accomplish the same amount of work, the same mission, and even grow and prosper, while reducing costs. 

I recently visited with the Executive Leadership of a small School District.  They invited me to meet with them for the day to discuss the latest developments and trends in technology and collaboration.  The purpose of the meeting was quickly conveyed to me by the opening statement from the Superintendent.  He was looking to technology to solve his current dilemma – they had to cut several million dollars out of their budget and find ways to reduce costs, while still serving their students.  He was trying to avoid cutting staff, the obvious first choice in cost reduction, because he knew that, ultimately, the result would be a drop in student graduation rates.  He, like many other leaders in education and business today, is looking to increase efficiency.  For the next seven hours, we took a virtual tour of a variety of technologies with this theme in mind. 

Here is a summary of what I learned from our conversation:

Invent – We are all inventors, creating the future every day.  It is not the technology that makes the difference; it is how we apply it to accomplish our mission that matters most.  It may come as a surprise, but often, manufacturers do not fully understand all of the ways their products can be implemented.  We, as the implementers of technology, need to think outside of the box and look for new ways to approach the challenges that face our organizations. 

Start by questioning the status quo:

  • Does all staff training and content delivery need to be done in person?
  • Can staff trainings, especially mandatory/compliance education be delivered via on demand video or real-time streaming?
  • Does the student need to be in the classroom, and does the instruction need to be done live?

Presentation capture technologies are becoming increasingly common in both business and Higher-Education, where the technology is referred to generically as “lecture capture”. It is my opinion that once the true capabilities of these kinds of technologies are fully understood, they will change how organizations deliver their services resulting in substantial cost reductions, enhanced services and a better user experience.

More information at: www.chariotgroup.com/mediasite/Default.aspx.

Reevaluate – This applies to a host of topics, but in this case, I am specifically referring to the use of technology.  Just because an organization recently implemented a new technology, does not mean it is being used appropriately or to its fullest extent.  An organization, and its management, must be open to expanded use options for its existing resources and actively engage other user groups for better ways to implement the tools it already has available to it. 

Videoconferencing is a great example of a technology that can be a very expensive capital investment with high operating costs.  Unfortunately, it is often used inappropriately or inefficiently, and therefore, organizations do not get the full return on their investment.  Worse yet, the high operating cost of these systems may prevent the implementation of lower cost collaboration options that offer both an opportunity to enhance the effectiveness of the existing videoconference system as well as an excellent low cost standalone alternative when face-to-face communication is not required. 

SMART Technologies Bridgit® is one example of this type of low cost collaboration offering.  More information available at: http://www.chariotgroup.com/smart/smart_bridgit.aspx

Engage – There is an old saying in the sales profession, “Make it easy for your customers to buy”.  The term ‘customer’ encompasses a variety of groups including an organization’s employees, clients and/or students.

In this multi-generational time, where an organization can have up to four different generations of ‘customers’ (Traditionalists, Baby Boomers, Generation X and Y), all of whom have different needs, values and expectations – “making it easy” across the board “for your customers to buy” means utilizing a variety of methods to get them engaged. 

Delivering content and exchanging ideas via alternative methods that the ‘customer’ prefers will be the key to fostering this engagement; whether that engagement means getting students exciting about learning, employees interested in their work environment or clients buying your products.

To summarize, ask the tuff questions and don’t be afraid of the answers. Get creative, invent and engage!  This is an exciting time and opportunity for us all to make changes for the better, create a more efficient and fun work environment, and make the technology work for us instead of the other way around!

 

The Technology-Biology Interface challenge which I have been writing about, until recently, has been primarily a technology challenge.  Quite simply, the technology and, therefore, the resulting products were not able to address the challenges of working in a group setting.  This, however, is changing rapidly leaving in its place the remaining obstacles, which are very human in nature.

Understanding – In order for the emerging collaboration technologies to be a long-term success within an organization, we need to change how we view them, buy them and implement them.  Currently, collaboration technologies are viewed as individual components installed in a specific location or with a narrowly defined use. But, in truth, what they actually represent is the next evolution of the organization’s communication infrastructure.  A macro view and implementation approach is now necessary in evaluating these new offerings; no different from the process when making company-wide Network or Telecommunication decisions.  Why should they be treated the same?  Convergence: Network, Telecommunication and Audio Visual technologies are merging, and therefore changing our existing communication systems into collaboration systems that will empower group communication and decision-making. 

Procurement – Once we change how we view these new technologies and recognize the power and potential impact they represent to our organizations, we will naturally change how they are procured.  We will begin to put in place an evaluation process that will look deeper than the latest software feature or design change.  We will begin to ask questions related to systems interoperability, remote management and manufacturer product roadmaps.  We will want to invest in collaboration products from manufacturers who have alliances with industry leaders like Microsoft, Cisco, Apple and others, because their insight will be of tremendous importance as these systems evolve.  As an example; Microsoft and Cisco currently feature complementary collaboration products in their Executive Briefing Centers; they understand the importance of these collaboration technologies and are making efforts to educate their top customers on how they fit into the new communication infrastructure.

Implementation and Training – The convergence of communication and collaboration technologies into one company-wide system will require a company-wide approach to implementation and training.  Just as each person in an organization needs to have the knowledge of how to use their phone and computer, each person will also need to have the knowledge of how to use the collaboration technologies.  No longer should the collaboration technologies in an organization be available to certain people in specific rooms, but rather, they should be available to everyone everywhere.  The organization that supports this new approach to the utilization of collaboration technologies will have the competitive advantage of enhanced efficiency in its communication and collaboration with reduced errors and cost.

Adaptation – The challenges listed above are typical of any emerging technology.  Recall that when the first desktop personal computer was put on the user’s desk, there was not a company-wide network to connect it to, nor was there a fully staffed Help Desk standing-by to assist.  It takes time to implement change of this type.

The challenge that we are facing today that we did not face in the past is the technology fatigue and general overwhelmed feeling that individual users are experiencing.  The initial euphoria of this new hyper-technological age is now beginning to morph into caution and resistance.  Caution is presenting itself in the form of inaction.  Recently, I spoke to a Technology Director for a major school district that said, “I have the money… but I am not buying anything right now.  Quite frankly, I am not sure what to buy.”  Resistance shows itself by people wanting to hold onto the familiar regardless of the benefits of the new.  They have had to adapt their lives in so many ways, so many times that they are holding their ground in order to try to regain control (and sanity).

I do believe that we are approaching the end of the Technology Revolution.  And, now it is time to revolutionize our behaviors related to technology by changing:

How we view them, how we buy them, and how we implement them.

 

How do we work together and share information in a group setting?  (Keep in mind that, today, a “group setting” no longer means that all of the participants are in the same location.)

When you walk into a conference, meeting or classroom room…

  • How do you share the information that you have collected/created with others?  Do you still hand out printed copies?  Or do you present using a multimedia projector?
  • How do the other participants collect the information you are sharing?  Do they still take notes by hand? Or are they using a laptop or tablet to take notes?
  • How is the information documented and shared?  Do you take a photo of the whiteboard notes for later transcription and distribution?

If you are currently struggling with any of the above questions, you understand the challenges to which I am referring.  As stated in my previous post, it is my view that this obstacle – the fact that we have not yet figured out how to work together, collaborate, and share information in a group setting in our new electronic age – is the last hurdle in the technology revolution and it could be a significant one.

On a personal level, most of us have adapted to working in an electronic environment.  We each have our “own” way of organizing information. The modern version of: “My desk may look cluttered, but I know where everything is!”  However, once we step into a group working environment, it becomes awkward and inefficient for us to share and collaborate with others our individually created electronic content. This hindrance is, I believe, the result of the barrier between the Technology-Biology Interface.

What do I mean by Technology-Biology Interface?  I am describing the discrepancy between the evolutionary paces of technology versus biology.  The evolution of technology is rapid and accelerating, while the evolution of human biology is slow and constant.  This dichotomy, I believe, is now the greatest barrier between what is technically possible and what is physically possible.

Like the technology that we work with, our bodies have their own Input and Output capabilities and limitations.  In order for us to interact with technology, we must be able to do at least one of the following four things; touch it (or gesture to it), see it, speak to it or hear it.

  • We communicate/create information (output) through speech, physical expression, touch and body language.
  • We receive information (input) through hearing, sight and touch.

And, there’s the choke-point, because even though technological advancement has been profound year-over-year, especially in the gaming industry, the primary components that are available for the biology interface in the group meeting space, the keyboard and mouse, for the most part, remain unchanged.  We have reached a point in time where the technology is limited by our ability to interface with it.

As an example, modern military aircraft are referred to as “pilot limited” because the aircraft and its associated technologies possess capabilities that are beyond human biology’s ability to withstand the conditions they are capable of creating.  Literally, the pilot will be injured or rendered unconscious before the aircraft reaches the limits of its potential.

While the technologies in meeting environments are not nearly as extreme, the concept of pilot, or in this case, “user limited” still applies.  There are certainly inefficiencies associated with not being able to interface with the available technology comfortably, accurately and at the level of its potential.  These limitations are further amplified in group and remote conferencing settings because as the number of participants increase, the more difficult the interactions become. The keyboard and mouse were not designed with group use in mind.

So what is the answer?  It is still a work in progress.  A whole industry has developed to address the Technology – Biology Interface and the challenges associated with group communication environments.

But in short, I believe the answer is:

  • Improved user interfaces (software),
  • Improved intra-device communication (standards) and,
  • Improved options for command control (physical interface)

Think of Tom Cruise in the “Minority Report”; the most memorable scene, to me, in the movie is the image of his character moving information around by touch on a clear whiteboard-sized display.  Think of “Star Trek”: the Captain and crew can instruct the elevator to its destination by speaking to it – with a simple command, “Bridge”.  These scenes appeal to us because they appear so natural.  It’s how we work intuitively; we touch and move things with our hands, we communicate with our voice.

While this work scenario is not available at the moment, it is under development and it is the key to improved productivity and reduced stress in group work settings.  In order to work together efficiently, we need to be able to communicate with our technology efficiently.

Manufacturers are working hard to make Hollywood’s imagination become our new reality and solve the Technology-Biology Interface challenge.  However, their successes in innovation may be delayed in practice as a result of our current procurement and implementation practices.  Our legacy approach to the evaluation, acquisition and deployment of technologies will have to change as these tools become increasingly integrated and capable.  In other words, we will have to make sure our processes evolve too.

In my next post, I will discuss how I think we can meet this challenge.

 

In my last post, I wrote: We are in a time that Historians will define as “The last days of the Technology Revolution”.  I agree that this statement sounds a little extreme – So, what do I mean?  In order to answer that question, we need to understand how Historians define the Industrial Revolution.

Wikipedia defines the Industrial Revolution as a, “period from the 18th to the 19th century where major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, transportation, and technology had a profound effect on the social, economic and cultural conditions of the times.”  The reference continues with, “The Industrial Revolution marks a major turning point in human history; almost every aspect of daily life was influenced in some way.”  One could easily substitute “Technology” for “Industrial”, change the dates and apply that same definition to the current times. The defining phrase being, “almost every aspect of daily life was influenced in some way”.

Clearly, industrialization did not stop when the revolution ended.  Likewise, we are not currently entering a period in which technical innovation will cease; in fact, it is accelerating.  So, what does the term “revolution” mean?  It is my view that what Historians are referring to, when they define a period like the Industrial or Technology Revolution, is not the innovations that took place, but rather the societal impact they had.  The industrial, and now the technical, innovations have impacted governmental, business and educational institutions with revolutionary changes (not to mention how we personally interact with our friends and family).  And, only after society catches up by adapting their skills and socially adjusts, does the “revolution” part of the period end – because, at this point, there is a new normal.

Now, consider where we are today in relation to technology; one could say, we now have a new normal.  Most institutions have installed the foundational infrastructure and have a newly skilled workforce that is substantially capable of managing the technology that is available to them.  Sure, there are still shortages of skilled workers, but with each passing year the workforce, and therefore, the institutions they represent, become more technically capable.  

As individuals, we have also personally adapted.  The vast majority of people are now capable of managing the technology that is available in their personal lives – even if it is just their cell phone.  Being a technical guru, a “geek”, is no longer required; the support structure is in place to enable and empower the user to the level of their interest.  Help Desk support, online tools and social media now provide powerful resources to the consumer.  As an example, my Mother, who is not a child of the technical age (I’ll give you a hint: I am 49) and has no technical background, just set up her home network.  She integrated her iPad, iPhone, laptop and her new desk top computer on her wireless network and connected it all to iCloud.  She did it all with online tools and manufacturer phone support. 

So what’s next? It sounds like we are approaching the end of the Historian’s definition of a revolution – well not quite.  There is one piece left and it could be a significant challenge.  The last problem to solve is: how do we work together, collaborate, and share information in a group setting?  With all of this technology around us, it is still very common to use a standard whiteboard or flip chart to share information.  How are the meeting notes captured?  Surprisingly, most often, the solution is to use a digital camera to take a picture of the information for transcription and distribution; a process that is inefficient, error prone, and expensive. 

Now add an increasingly decentralized workforce to the puzzle and collaboration gets even more challenging.  Even with the use of videoconferencing and data sharing tools, like WebEx®, there are limitations.  You are still in presentation mode; you show your stuff and they show theirs – separate workspaces.  A very positive, creative, dynamic is added when we are able to work in the same space – even if it is a virtual workspace.  The video gaming industry has known this for years and supports this type of interactivity in increasingly sophisticated ways.  Imagine the power of Microsoft’s Kinetic® enabling your meeting space.  And, what if you could harness the screen sharing capabilities and interactivity of online gaming sites for your remote collaboration?  It would change everything.  It would change how we communicate. 

It might just mark the end of the Technology Revolution.

 
Technology

Technology Revolution: Mice Face-off

We are in a time that Historians will define as “The last days of the Technology Revolution” – At least that is my view on things.  This statement may sound a little bold and perhaps a bit farfetched, but I have presented the idea on several occasions to well informed individuals and a variety of groups and the reply is often the same, “That makes sense.  I never thought of it that way.”

The purpose behind my writing is not to discuss the technology, but to focus on how the technology is going to be applied to improve the outcome of the users intent.  I am using the term “outcome” because I am specifically interested in how the technology will impact our ability to do our work, and therefore improve our professional lives.

There was a time when technology for the sake of technology was enough – we bought the latest gadget/innovation in an effort to keep up; or at least look like we were.  Buying decisions were made with little emphasis on how the purchase would improve our work lives or its return on the investment.  More than once I have heard the phrase, “It’s important to our clients that we are using the latest technology”.  I believe this time has passed and increasingly decision makers are getting back to the basics.  They are beginning to hold innovation to the timeless standard of “What’s in it for me and my organization?”.   Stated another way, “How will technology make my job easier and support the goals of my company?”.

This topic, “How do we use technology to get our work done?” will be one of the areas of my focus and comments.  In some cases, I will not be writing about a single technology but how technologies in general should be combined or in what order they should be applied.  I will also be taking a look to the future in an effort to determine which products are a good bet for the long term and which ones will be just small stepping stones to the future.  Additionally, I plan to include some colorful stories from the Last Frontier in a series called “Techs in the Tundra”.

In my next post, I will explain why I think we are in the “Last Days of the Technology Revolution”.  I hope you find my posts informative and thought provoking. I welcome your feedback.

© 2011 Unknownium Login Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha